I would like to see a super cut of the faces of certain people on here reading this statement
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your sarcasm is spot on
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What don’t you understand?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
probably because the media did nothing but focus on the possible "rift" between Dems and GOP ONLY ask questions about the dual track and are already calling the infrastructure DOA....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dude, the point of this statement is not to clarify, but to put the fire out. His remarks were clear, and it *was* a veto threat, albeit an erroneous one: "tandem" means that the bipartisan bill won't even get to him without reconciliation bill passing. Dems control the process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s all about you, isn’t it? Great tweet!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He is clear. He doesnt want to be bipartisan. You know he doesnt because he says he does
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Does Biden have the Dem votes to pass the bipartisan package alone? Did he have them yesterday? Or last month? Okay. Soooo….what’s changed, exactly?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Biden’s statement was unambiguous. He said, “if only one comes to me, this is the only one that comes to me, I'm not signing it. It's in tandem.” This isn’t a clarification. If he’s willing to sign the bipartisan deal without the reconciliation bill, that’s a change in position
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.