So no politician who is in favor of gun control can ever have police protection?
-
-
-
Yep, that's about right. The fact they feel the need to have armed protection means they either fear the criminals they want to render us defenseless against, or they fear law abiding citizens. Guess which one they fear the most and try to disarm? Hint, it's not the criminals.
-
Show me where he wants to render us defenseless.
-
I guess you don't keep up with the Liberal agenda that seeks to regulate guns a little at a time, with the ultimate goal of banning all of them...except for the ones they use to protect themselves. They didn't used to admit it. Lately they are far bolder and say it plainly.
-
That's a great scare tactic used by the right wing and the NRA. What part of "common sense gun laws" is so frightening?
-
Define common sense gun laws.
-
For me common sense gun laws are the ones the founding fathers put in our constitution. They put it in writing that common sense says we don’t get our right to protect ourselves from our government. As Americans we are born with it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
police r trained, licensed 2 use guns 2 protect. Student shooters r not.
@SenSanders shud have security.u shud learn more about#guncontrol -
People that have been trained and have concealed carry permits are also licensed to protect people per se.
-
Responsible gun owners are not murderers, student shooters are.
-
Absolutely right!!!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like the security guard at Parkland
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They tried to use children before to disarm us and the same demonic force is trying it again.pic.twitter.com/bvpyCvc5ut
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.