Brad, that paper was discredited by 30 years of research at this university. Here are some of the 1000s of studies—with “trained” humans. https://langint.pri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ai/index.html
-
-
Rosy, thank you. It is refreshing to hav an honest insight here. Much appreciated.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
As someone who studies memory I agree that this is a very hard task and noone will be able to do this very well without a large amount of training. But the monkeys were trained too, and this undercuts the claim that monkeys are particularly good on this task.
-
Yes my anecdotal experience is not intended to either support or disprove any peer reviewed data, it is simply an interesting story. What is very real is that you need to be very focused on the task to perform it. Some patterns are also easier than others.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I totally agree! I’d think that: 1) It’s not an easy game 2) you’d improve on it with a few months training 3) not everyone can do it perfectly even with training 4) not every chimp can do it either I wouldn’t even rule out 5) chimps *could* be better than humans on task! BUT:
-
…the scientific author Matsuzawa, in cited 2013 review, only suggests developmental WM morphometry differences in prefrontal cortex. It does NOT advance a theory of “language regions directly replaced memory” that
@BrianRoemmele seems to have falsely put Matsuzawa’s name on. - Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.