holy shit Pixar. what were y'all thinking
-
-
-
Wait is this how ndas work? You can't sign one for like untitled Pixar project number 125?pic.twitter.com/T7zEx0MIQb
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The pictures don't look the same though? She's not the first person to paint a unicorn on a van, she doesn't own the concept of unicorns on vans. If they'd straight-up copied the exact picture then i might be with her.
-
It sounds they may have admitted it which could have an affect. Then again Disney have the money to win
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Whaa? One van has a pegasus and moon art, the other has a unicorn and gem lightning art
-
Did you not read the article? It literally states that Pixar rented the van for a one time event (with a documented contract) and then admitted to using the vehicle for direct reference, but said they couldn't made a nda because the film don't have a title yet.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I hope she gets PAID.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I hope Disney is forced to give this lady whatever she wants. But also, that’s a pegasus....
-
No doubt this was the exec: "Let's change it to a Pegasus so she can't sue us."
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Wow. Yeah, you're right. With they way disney/pixar went about the "rental" and ignored the details of the contract, this film might get shelved forever.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
approved | bylines