Others are healthcare (US especially) and education. +-10% of GDP per cap - about 5 years' growth - is basically irrelevant in practice but in discussions people think of it as being a big deal.
Prikaži ovu nit
When I hear "X would reduce GDP" as an argument against X, I'm increasingly skeptical. GDP per cap in the west doesn't matter, because we spend most of our money on things like houses/rent whose prices track GDP perfectly. Our world is just kind of broken on this issue.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I don't know if somebody coined this already but the rule seem to be: "The majority of the above-sustenance-resources will be always used to wage zero-sum status wars" Although in the general case it's still better to live in a high GDP p/c country, just not by the % difference
-
meaning if a country has an x2 higher GDP p/c it's not x2 better to live.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.