Roscosmos has thousands of employees who worked on Soyuz if they wanted to find someone to blame, but Rogozin is so allergic to any criticism he’d rather promote this absurd story.https://twitter.com/KathyLueders/status/1426250198855081985 …
-
Thanks. And are you preparing for a future where fully reusable systems are a real thing? I mean, you must have something on the drawing board given the progress in Texas and also the initial developments in China.
Not all items need to be reusable. For example, toothpicks, matches and syringes. Something else must be disposable, otherwise humanity will lose birth control). We own this technology, but so far we do not see any sense or economics in it.
-
-
Those examples are all very simple mass-produced items, though. A rocket is not that simple, and not (yet) built by the thousands either. Unless you're talking about missiles, but those are much simpler and built for destruction itself
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
-
-
-
This is super egoist thought process. Spacex is building future at warp speed and your technology is slowly fading away into the past. By the time, Mars colonisation starts, still u would be preparing to launch decade old angara
.. -
20 years to re-repeat the achievements of the 1960's era with all the fancy modern technologies at hand: warp speed. Got it.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
@Rogozin can we get any new information on the Amur vehicle? Its been a long time since you've announced it, and a lot has changed since then, but we haven't really got any official word of the state of the program.Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Wow, comparing disposable rockets worth hundreds of millions and even billions to toothpicks, matches, syringes and condoms. Brilliant...
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Подождите, а зачем мы тогда Амур-СПГ делаем?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
If you do not see the economics of it, then that is a big issue. It’s simple. Less cost of rocket: more missions, less cost to the tax payer, global warming, etc. I want Roscosmos to succeed, but sticking to old values will leave it in the dust in the new age of space exploration
-
It sees. But the grapes are sour.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.