You know what the IPCC doesn't mention? Global TC landfalls (they do mention landfalls in Madagascar and the US) I wonder why not? Our dataset was updated & published in recent WMO TC assessmentpic.twitter.com/oXYEfWFBWb
Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
You need to identify the underlying manipulation of behavioral psychology and its connection with advertising and subscription sales.
But isn't this exactly what the IPCC want? How else to explain over 50% of all scenario mentions in their report being of the 'worse case scenario'?
IPCC report is using the Nostradamus/John of Patmos style guide. To paraphrase Arlo Guthrie, “you can quote anything you want, from IPCC Sixth Assessment”.
The linear global warming trend since January, 1979 remains at +0.14 C/decade, +0.12 C/decade over the global-averaged oceans, +0.18 C/decade over global-averaged land) 1979-2020 = +0.56 C warming ~ 40 years 1979-2060 = +1.12 C projecting observed trend 1979-2100 = +1.68 Cpic.twitter.com/Yxh844xdPz
My dears, this report caused a wave like "Tsunami" in Brazil. The apocalypse has passed and they are waiting for redemption. The climate religion in big business has already caused an unprecedented commotion.
Why is warming of 1.6C preferable to 1.7C? Does that not depend upon the incremental costs?
@threadreaderapp unroll please
Hello, the unroll you asked for: IPCC AR6 WG1
Some initial comments Think of these as working notes… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1424711728898535425.html … Have a good day. 
For the Atlantic article, didn't you conclude that fire-weather & heat waves are increasing? Minus the hyperbole, isn't that just what that article is saying? Apologies if I misread
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.