body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 X Corp.

Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

@RobertEllsberg

@RobertEllsberg

Furthermore, he refutes Barr’s fatuous argument that there can be no obstruction without an underlying crime, and preemptively offers devastating legal and constitutional rebuttal to claim that POTUS can’t be charged for exercising Article II powers.

5:56 PM · Apr 20, 2019

@RobertEllsberg

@RobertEllsberg

In short, Barr’s summary, the basis for a month of headlines and tweets about “no obstruction,” could not be more dishonest or disreputable. (The claim of “no collusion”—distinct from criminal conspiracy—turns out to be just as phony.) All should read and judge for themselves.

3

7