I have the greatest respect for Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, especially as a theologian. However, I disagree with most of his analysis of the sex abuse crisis. Blaming it on poor theology and the sexual mores of the 1960s dramatically misses the mark. 1/
Conversation
First, Pope Benedict casts the sexual abuse crisis primarily as a theological problem, blaming progressive theology after the Second Vatican Council, as if what was needed to combat abuse was an acceptance of the correct theology. Thus, it was largely a problem of orthodoxy. 2/
15
36
214
But that misses the mark. One of the worst offenders was Father Marcial Maciel Degollado, founder of the Legionaries of Christ, a priest who promoted through his religious order the most “orthodox” theology one could imagine. He was also a serial abuser and a rapist. 3/
10
51
290
Second, Benedict casts abuse as essentially a problem of morals. Now, pedophilia is obviously immoral, but it is also a disease. One reason it persisted was because it seen as primarily a moral problem. Thus, after “Father” had recognized he had done wrong, we could move on. 4/
19
41
209
But it is not simply immoral. It is, far more fundamentally, a serious illness, a profound psychological problem. Simply admitting one’s moral wrongdoing is insufficient. 5/
11
37
233
Benedict’s suggestion that abuse was somehow acceptable by church leaders because of lax 1960s morals also strains credulity. It’s doubtful anyone approved of it morally. Rather, bishops responded to abuse in sinful and criminal ways: neglect, cover up, moving around priests. 6/
10
51
283
Also, the idea that the sexual mores of the 1960s were to blame (a common refrain in many of Pope Benedict’s earlier writings) neglects the fact that sex abuse happened in the church during the 1940s and 1950s, and far earlier. 7/
18
57
303
People had sex outside of marriage and molested children in the supposedly wholesome 40s and 50s; and many of the priests who abused did so decades before the late 60s, when presumably the cultural infection was peaking and were educated and formed as priests long before that. 8/
9
40
238
Finally, it blames the sex abuse crisis on the culture, not the church. It focuses the outside rather than the inside, failing to look at the deep structural flaws and sins within the church (specifically, a clericalism that privileged the word of the priest over the victim). 9/
25
88
553
This was a disappointing analysis from a brilliant theologian. For a more thorough analysis, consult the John Jay Report, which still offers the most comprehensive examination of the root causes of the sex abuse crisis. 10/10
71
64
475
While Law was treated as a model of orthodoxy and moral rectitude, he was presiding over one of the greatest scandals in the history of the church. Pope B blames the failings of moral theologians and laments a time when "my own books were hidden away," in certain seminaries. ..
1
1
Yet he offers not a single word of insight or remorse about his own failures, or how clerical culture contributed to a system that placed a higher value on avoiding "scandal" or protecting priests than on protecting innocent children. He has learned nothing. Sad.
1
1
14
Show replies
B16 uses the phrase "acceptance of theology", something like that. A bunch of our prelates apparently were conversant in the theology without "accepting" it. They parlayed the words to a comfortable lifestyle and status. They will rot in hell.,