This is a perfect example of why a senator should not be presiding over this trial. It should be a judge (even if not Chief Justice Roberts).https://twitter.com/TPCarney/status/1359661645241401346 …
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The pasture, Leahy. Now!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep. He seems exhausted and confused.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was a ruling by the Parliamentarian, and Lee knows that perfectly well. It had nothing to do with Leahy.
-
perfect ANSWER! Spot on...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lee just made himself a witness with testimony. Can he still be a fair juror?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, there are senators whose cognitive faculties are not nearly as deprecated due to age. But generally agree — more interesting question is, if not the CJ of SCOTUS, how would that judge be picked and could a state court judge be eligible?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How many judges have an instant command of parliamentary procedure?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tbf no judge could do any better with senate process questions. They should just let the parliamentarian chair it. She’s the only one who understands the rules.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.