That's a fair explanation, Rob but doesn't explain why it is two different ceremonies cut together. Surely the preview package from start to finish is one thing, but spliced between another piece of (more recent) footage is another? No-one would be bothered about../contd
Hi Howard, the Editor of Breakfast has explained: the 2016 footage was drawn up from the archive for use on Sunday morning as preview material. This material was then used in error today when yesterday's footage should have been used. That's the truth.
-
-
-
..this error if it weren't for the fact that it is well known to be politically damaging to look a disrespectful mess/holding a wreath upside down at the Cenotaph, eg Michael Foot, and this is during an election campaign so it's suspicious that <ONLY> the PM's bit was substituted
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
So he’s saying it was accidentally cut in at exactly the right moment. And you believe him?
-
I do not. It is not believable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At the very least, this calls for a full onscreen apology and explanation tomorrow, with the same degree of prominence as I gather was given to the original item.
-
Plus, of course, a showing of the *correct* clip.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the whole sequence had been from 2016 that would be feasable. Splicing one section in from 2016 to a sequence from 2019 is not an accident particularly when the bit spliced was to attempt to cover up Johnsons poor appearance and errors.
-
That didn't happen
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Nobody's buying it pal.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.