Child mutilator.
https://twitter.com/DrRobertHamilt1/status/1060697012901826560 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @_MrsAtheist_
Um what???? Male circumcision is for the health of the child it prevents illnesses reduced the risk of diseases like HIV. You need to educate your self if you think it is wrong.
12 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Mattlat83 @_MrsAtheist_
How does circumcising a baby protect them against HIV?
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Adult male circumcision is a recognized low-cost method of reducing HIV in settings where the disease is prevalent and medical resources are limited. See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29617778 Inner surface of foreskin is highly vulnerable to HIV; removing foreskin substantially reduces risk.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Oh. Adult male. Okay, well that's fine then....I'm totally in favour of adult males getting circumcised if they so elect to. Sounds like there's no reason to do it to babies....awesome! Glad we cleared that up
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yep. By all means. Adult men, cut that foreskin off! Or just practice safe sex. That might be easier.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
That is a logical fallacy to assume I am saying circumcision removes the need for safe sex practices.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The part you missed is the bit where babies aren't actually having sex and therefore this argument in favour of circumcision isn't relevant until adulthood.
-
-
See my other point about cancer and uti.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.