$.80 a dose, scalable, only available possible proven out-patient protocol, +60 year safety profile with known risks, top treatment by +50% of the world. Alternative out-patient treatment: Nothing!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yet the pundits want a more expensive drug so they can make money on the virus
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why in the hell they are still fighting against it?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you !
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If this turns out to be correct, and so many In our nursing homes and elderly are dying unnecessarily, there should be hell to pay by someone. I fear until there is results from a double blind randomized trial, these results will be sadly ignored.
-
As they mostly should be. Without a RCT, and a comparison control group, most data is meaningless, especially since we can do RCTs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Here’s the problem with this. The AAPS is a political organization. That doesn’t mean they’re wrong. I happen to think HCQ probably works if given early. But I wouldn’t put any stock in what a political org says, right or left.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.