.@RichardDawkins Don't you think it might be degrading to people with disabilities who are alive human beings?
Apparently I'm a horrid monster for recommending WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS to the great majority of Down Syndrome fetuses. They are aborted.
-
-
- View other replies
-
@jjarichardson No, because I am talking about a decision taken about fetuses. A decision which the great majority in practice take.2 retweets 10 likes - View other replies
-
@RichardDawkins@jjarichardson most in that position do take that stance. But you're close to implying that all DS fetuses should be aborted3 retweets 1 like - View other replies
-
.
@TheImprovateer@RichardDawkins@jjarichardson I think RD implies moral calc heavily in favour of abortion if early warning foetus has DS.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
.
@TheImprovateer@RichardDawkins@jjarichardson Acting against moral calculus is immoral, IMHO, but not as immoral as less borderline issues0 retweets 0 likes -
.
@Atticus_Amber@TheImprovateer@RichardDawkins Dawkins wasn't being an advocate. He implied that DS people not being aborted was immoral.0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
@jjarichardson@Atticus_Amber@RichardDawkins He implied that it should mean all DS fetuses should be aborted.0 retweets 0 likes - Show more
-
-
-
@RichardDawkins And you don't think that's an ableist or discriminatory recommendation?0 retweets 6 likes - View other replies
-
@JVanMaren Why would it be ableist? You're not discriminating against disabled people, because fetuses aren't those.0 retweets 3 likes -
@Thucydiplease@JVanMaren at what point does a foetus become a person? How do we know when this should be?0 retweets 0 likes -
@Francislunn
@Thucydiplease Simple. human beings have human rights. human rights begin when the human being begins, which science tells us.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@Francislunn
@Thucydiplease Fertilization. unless human rights are contingent on age, which they are not.0 retweets 0 likes -
@JVanMaren@Thucydiplease I'm not necessarily criticising your position but I don't think science gives all the answers here0 retweets 0 likes -
@Francislunn
@Thucydiplease if humans have human rights & science tells us when a human begins, that should inform our position.0 retweets 0 likes - Show more
-
-
-
@RichardDawkins Horrid monster, perhaps not. Displaying the inevitable eugenics of atheist beliefs, most definitely.0 retweets 3 likes - View other replies
-
@JVanMaren@RichardDawkins Eugenics is hardly an "inevitable" atheist belief. Also, what on earth is an "atheist belief"?0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
@LeaderGrev@RichardDawkins Things which an atheist believes. Like free will, which Sam Harris is honest enuf 2 admit can't exist.0 retweets 0 likes -
@JVanMaren The only "belief" shared by atheists is a disbelief in God. Sam Harris can believe what he wants but it's not an "atheist belief"0 retweets 0 likes -
- View other replies
-
-
@LeaderGrev Indeed. And the belief in no God has other natural conclusions, as Sam Harris points out.0 retweets 0 likes -
@JVanMaren People derive different conclusions from a belief in no God. Harris doesn't speak for all Atheists.0 retweets 0 likes - Show more
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Richard Dawkins
Jacob Richardson
Ed Cara
Atticus_of_Amber
Jonathon Van Maren
Sam Pritchard
Francis L
Mikhail Klimentov