It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans? Facts ignore ideology.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
At this point he might as well just reveal the tweet as an experiment on how far a statement can be stretchedpic.twitter.com/lEXQXbi3ii
- Näytä vastaukset
-
-
-
No one says it’s impossible. They say it’s bad.
-
They are saying that even IN THIS THREAD.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Eugenics has a specific meaning separate from the biological process of artificial selection. Stop being dim and dying on a hill absolutely noone is arguing with you on. NOONE is denying any """"scientific facts"""" ffs.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I understand what you're saying, I really do. But I think you're digging a hole. It's best to just say eugenics, while it works, as was done by the Nazis (Nazis were obviously going to come up.) it's never something to even be considered.. For obvious reasons.
-
Well except that it's not something only the Nazi's did. We test for many debilitating diseases during pregnancy and the results can inform someone and influence their decision to have an abortion or not. That is also eugenics, and it's one that is morally defensible.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
What. Do. You. Mean. "WORK"?
-
He means it's possible to genetically enhance some human traits through selective reproduction the same way we did with cows to produce more milk. That's it. Bro it's not a riddle it's straightforward
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.