Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
RichFelker's profile
Rich Felker
Rich Felker
Rich Felker
@RichFelker

Tweets

Rich Felker

@RichFelker

Yeah, I do @musllibc, FOSS & infosec stuff. But now is not the time for a mostly-/only-tech Twitter feed.

musl-libc.org
Joined March 2014

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Paul Romer‏ @paulmromer Apr 14

      Thoughts about open source (Jupyter) vs proprietary software (Mathematica) prompted by the Somers article: https://paulromer.net/jupyter-mathematica-and-the-future-of-the-research-paper/ …

      20 replies 235 retweets 545 likes
    2. Michael Chirico‏ @michael_chirico Apr 14
      Replying to @paulmromer

      throughout my PhD I became more and more extreme, to the point where now I don't consider research "reproducible" unless the analysis was done with open-source software... which makes very few papers in e.g. AER reproducible

      2 replies 5 retweets 45 likes
    3. Brad Monk‏ @bradcog Apr 14
      Replying to @michael_chirico @paulmromer

      What if the data was collected using Olympus microscopes and not built using homebrew optics or genome sequencing was done using illumina ngs and not sanger sequencing?

      4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
      Rich Felker‏ @RichFelker Apr 15
      Replying to @bradcog @michael_chirico @paulmromer

      IMO it depends on whether the instruments are documented such that the results should (theoretically) be reproducible taking new data with comparable instruments.

      12:50 PM - 15 Apr 2018
      • 1 Like
      • Michael Chirico
      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Rich Felker‏ @RichFelker Apr 15
          Replying to @RichFelker @bradcog and

          If the instruments are black boxes using proprietary tricks to produce their outputs, I don't think you can call the results reproducible.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Brad Monk‏ @bradcog Apr 15
          Replying to @RichFelker @michael_chirico @paulmromer

          In my experience translating results from proprietary equipment is a lot more difficult than translating code, by orders of magnitude.

          1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
        4. Michael Chirico‏ @michael_chirico Apr 16
          Replying to @bradcog @RichFelker @paulmromer

          I think this actually bolsters my assertion that this research is not _reproducible_. this of course doesn't invalidate said research; I think a different bar exists for "reproducibility" in this case (verified by equipment from multiple manufacturers, e.g.)

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        5. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info