Telling forensic workers anything about the evidence should carry mandatory 5+ years penalty.
-
-
-
Not sure about the penalty but I agree that there seems to be problems with procedures. I’m not sure how forensics fingerprint analysis works but it should definitely by double-blind and off-site. That just sounds like best practices.
-
Yeah at heart I'm a prison abolitionist but I'm not in any hurry to hand the benefits of that view to the ppl perpetuating the prison system & abuse of it.
-
Absolutely. Death Penalty Abolitionist myself. We can work to abolish the death penalty & advocate for DNA testing etc to make it better. People get mad tho bc they say we argue it makes it more expensive which is why we say we need to abolish it. I see the fallacy but
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We still accept 'eyewitness testimony' as evidence. Flawed doesn't even begin to describe that. May as well just ask a random person to describe another random person.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.