Future of musl locale/strerror(). In LC_MESSAGES=C, strerror(ENOENT) = ?
In the past I'd heard the opposite from a lot of people - that the E* codes were more useful because they could look them up in docs/manpages, whereas the English msgs required figuring out which E* code they came from.
-
-
I don't disagree with that, been there too.
-
For that reason, I tend to like strerror(EFOO)="EFOO". Also reducing anglocentricism. But I know it's unconventional & likely controversial; that's why I'm trying to get a feel for ppls opinions on it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.