The US couldn’t even VOTE against a totalitarian government, what makes them think they could organise an armed resistance?
People who make this criticism, you included, are making the mistake of taking their claim at face value rather than looking at the coded meaning.
-
-
They have no interest in actually rebelling against an armed state police/military force. The police are usually aligned with them or at least not opposed. Their interest is refusal to obey "totalitarian" court orders.
-
See desegregation, or the whole Bundy bs for a more recent example.
-
Preposterous! Look at how they rose to the defense of a man with a legal concealed carry permit who was murdered by police in his car as soon as he informed them that he had a CCW.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.