I should just block systemd apologists preemptively
-
-
Replying to @tef
headless systems not coming up after reboot because lennart decided that eth0 is not good enough for an interface name
3 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @whitequark @tef
As much as I love blaming systemd, the problem goes back much further to kernel devs making device numbering non-deterministic (asynchronous probe). But until Lennart that only affected rare use case of >1 eth port.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker @tef
Nope. udev used to have rules making device numbering deterministic (record-on-first-use). then systemd removed that in favor of their insane numbering scheme.
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
Replying to @whitequark @tef
Ah yeah. I was thinking prior to udev, or with no udev running. But then systemd consumed udev. Uhg.
7:11 PM - 31 Jan 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.