So...y'all folks who've done that Google thing where you match your picture with a work of art...you realize that's a way for a search engine to eliminate false matches and make it easier to ID your face, right?
-
-
The user research I've seen on data retention hasn't said what you're claiming, but I'd love to see it if you've got some. User research has done a ton to shape what we do, but we're always learning.
-
Ask. Is any data (even "anonymized" or "non-identifiable" or "only hashes") derived from the operation stored in data set?
-
Sorry, ask who what? I thought I was asking you. :)
-
I meant the teams reporting their apps' behavior or the ppl doing the research on them.
-
Here ya go, a statement that it does what it says it does:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/the-switch/wp/2018/01/16/google-app-that-matches-your-face-to-artwork-is-wildly-popular-its-also-raising-privacy-concerns/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think Lea's point is the average user would have no idea what you meant by that.
-
My point is that they shouldn't have to. Non-retention should be complete & safe to an average user who doesn't understand technical loopholes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
), but protecting and respecting users is literally my team's job.