Clearly getting rid of a $250 service fee on a $500k property transaction that gets folded into $1000 insurance you need anyway is worth the massive cost of a blockchain.https://twitter.com/waynehartman/status/946861706214379520 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I actually have a good case! Certificate transparency. It's a global public ledger, and unlike with cryptocurrencies (where the "global" part is actually bad), it is a perfect fit for the problem domain
-
Maybe we disagree on definition of "blockchain" but I don't see any benefit from the characteristics I see as blockchain.
-
"global public ledger based on a Merkle tree", without necessarily specifying proof-of-work, proof-of-stake or anything else as a block inclusion criterion because these can vary widely
-
To me the "proof-of-blah" is a defining part of "blockchain" vs just "Merkle tree ledger".
-
proof-of-stake designs are potentially interesting but I don't think there is enough experience in the wild with them yet to say if they amount to something great
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.