Firefox’s ARG move and Netflix’s analytics tweet this week spark really intriguing privacy discussions about the operators of products that have become integral to our daily lives recklessly playing with them.
-
-
I still don't see it. How does a humorous comment with (probably) no fact behind it become an indication of anything?
-
It might not be. The point is we can't know. But the comment provokes the question and probably (in a sense that I feel we'd find this if we had sufficient data) increases the chances that there really is a problem.
-
Even if the chance is the same, the perception changes. Joking about something you shouldn't have access to, but plausibly could if you or someone else was abusing privilege, is not funny.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Access control ? This type of data is probably a huge talking point that’s plastered everywhere. If they paid millions for streaming rights to content that less than 100 people watched, that’s a teachable moment.
-
Huge difference in "movie X was watched N times" or "by only K users" and "user A watched movie X T times in one day".
-
BTW your apoligism for bad corporate behavior doesn't go well with your rose...
-
Yeah. Not advocating but I guess I’m saying it’s pretty common
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.