Docker's philosophy in a nutshell: 1) solve a painful problem with a simple tool. Ignore the purists criticizing the tech 2) get lots of happy users 3) gradually improve the tech without sacrificing simplicity 4) tech previously reserved for purists is now democratized 5) repeat
-
-
The key is that happy users create opportunities to fund work. If you start by pleasing the purists, you get an impressive but complex system with almost no users. Eventually resources dry up.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The way runc spinoff and rootless runc went though suggests to me Docker is doing lots of this right.
-
Trying to! So much more to do...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sure. Technical debt resonates as so many organizations feel like that. Changing things a lot is hard and knowing if rebuild is better than modify is really hard. But my experience is that deciding to change helps productivity
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Always ask: are they really new requirements? Or just completion of not-so-well-undersood requirements? Cost only shifts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.