It’s truly the only answer. Facebook used the only technical solution any of us can think of, and it kind of sucks, but everything else sucks more.
-
-
Replying to @hacks4pancakes @josephfcox
A huge nude stash to prevent sharing. I want to be optimistic but there's a psychological fact being obviated: they are asking victims to transfer their trust to them.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @eduxmonge @josephfcox
People have been talking for days and nobody has proposed any viable alternative.
8 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
You can't even suggest "just don't share nudes!" because that's what the current dating/romance landscape is for a lot of people. It's the equivalent suggestion of abstinence-only contraception.
5 replies 5 retweets 23 likes -
Never. Suggesting "no nudes at all" is censorship and repression of people's intimacy (just to get that of the way). I just hope FB and that Australian comission operate with proper psychological guidance, tech facts aside.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eduxmonge @aksfjh and
They could attempt to enforce "no nudes except yourself and the person you're chatting with" via facial & body recognition models.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker @eduxmonge and
Can only work with the data they're attempting to gather now, which is controversial to say the least
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Their volume of data is probably sufficient to match or even generate fake nudes for an average user w/o having seen any real ones.
-
-
Replying to @RichFelker @aksfjh and
Simple model: disallow nude if face is present and mismatches or if body build is significantly different from in existing pic corpus.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.