Some of the workarounds suggested are legit, but "move part of function to a header" is sooooo beyond acceptable.https://twitter.com/chandlerc1024/status/918036565649002496 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would consider a number (not all) of
@chandlerc1024's suggestions improvements to code quality. Move rarely-used paths out-of-line? Great! -
Unless already tightly coupled, putting code in headers is usually a big offense. Factoring based on perf rather than logic even moreso.
-
Making silly transformations the compiler should be able to make can also be uglifying/obscuring:https://twitter.com/chandlerc1024/status/918037668436500480 …
-
"Let's go back to the 90s and start making random ugly source perturbations to help the optimizer" is not what LLVM should be bringing us.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.