And why do actual CV/AI driving when you could just use MT drivers?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
probably because only auto vendors are willing to sponsor. but some projects try to do generic solution (or even most of prototypes)
-
Yes. Because they want to bundle the final product, charge way more than sum of parts, and control it all.
-
an open or FOSS solution would need someone privileged enough to have skills and willing to donate their time
-
I'm not particularly demanding that it be open/FOSS, just critical of the "if you don't like your driver buy a different car" aspect.
-
Not to mention what happens when support for an old model is dropped and the fix is "buy a new car".
-
One of the reasons is because generally there's a requirement for safety certification of the entire hw+sw stack as an integrated whole
-
Also it's probably too early to standardize one sensor package as would be required for interchangability
-
Humans get by with basically just 2 eyes, 2 ears, and accelerometer as the sensor package. Bots should be able to do so too. :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.