I don't think I would trust anyone that doesn't have a preference on P vs. NP to evaluate this. Means they haven't thought about it much.
I wouldn't trust anyone who thinks P=NP is plausible. It's a couple steps up from perpetual motion machines.
-
-
The question is whether P≠NP is provable/proven, not whether it's true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.