Intel truly adores crippling their products. Hopefully not the case for the 2k USD 18 core / 36 thread i9-7980XE... https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/07/intel-core-i9-fastest-chip-but-too-darn-expensive/ …pic.twitter.com/RyppeALnyL
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I'm rather surprised someone with your attention to security would be into OC stuff. I'd think you'd underclock for added robustness. ;-)
Caring about robustness just means being conservative: higher voltage than strictly necessary and better cooling to compensate for it.
OEMs often sell desktops / laptops with inadequate cooling / PSUs, where running mprime's stress test will force shutoff or overload PSU.
A real security issue is that unlocked core multipliers, ratio limits, offsets, etc. means that real root could brick the CPU via the MSR.
Have far bigger concerns than losing the cost of the CPU if an attacker gets real root or less than that though...
Used i5-4590 for building CopperheadOS and was terrible. 120m->25m for clean builds with i7-6950X @ 4.3GHz, similar for incremental builds.
Intel doesn't feel like selling high clocked, high core count CPUs with high TDP so OCing is the only way to get that out of what they sell.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.