So for a long time I've felt intuitively that Shor's algorithm is bs, but I'm trying to actually understand the math behind it now....
And this translates into relatively high probability of getting the desired result as a measurement.
-
-
However, for very large numbers, shouldn't there be an increasingly large set of false positives that come out with near-uniform prob?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.