we (charity) often can't remove ppl from database for multiple legit reasons - but we do let them know this
-
-
(it's mostly to do with record keeping for tax auditing related stuff)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Is the way such record keeping could be adapted to convert all the identifying info to hardcopy-only and anonymize db content immediately?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
You could, but depending on how the laws are written it might not be compliant.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ouinne @RichFelker and
I know that when my job was data collection compliance reporting the different jurisdictions and their contradictory rules were challenging.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
also some of our evidence is digital only when people have done everything online
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I mean printing it on-demand when a user wants their data scrubbed & just keeping a record of where the paper gets filed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ah it's not always that straightforward
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah, and then you get into questions of scale. So one person opts out ok but what do you do when 100k people opt out?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes I don't necessarily think it makes sense. Just wondering if it had been considered.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
A less costly alternative might be append-only (no-read) digital storage that can only be read from a local terminal on legal demand.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.