today I found some code in LLVM that implies a Windows plus Mach-O subtarget is legal and I don't want to be alive anymore
You could choose another one as long as it's reasonably expressive, but what's idiotic is using a bloated pseudo-abstraction like BFD...
-
-
yeah. I have been half-tempted to do a custom binary format for my compiler and "testkern" thing, but haven't gotten to it...
-
as-is, have been using static-ELF, both dynamic-ELF and PE/COFF have aspects I don't particularly like, but are commonly understood fmts...
-
some of my past stuff has mostly just used stripped-down PE/COFF with a WAD variant glued on. could just do a WAD-like binfmt FWIW...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.