can someone explain to me the intracacies of california state law that allows for sb562 to just outright ban insurance markets
-
-
Replying to @sigfig
holy shit, is THAT what it does i'm about as in favor of single payer as it gets and that seems completely insane
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @whitequark @sigfig
doesn't single payer literally require banning insurance markets i mean that's what single payer is
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna @sigfig
oops, I misunderstood the term, s/single payer/right to health care/ then
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @whitequark @sigfig
single payer in the normal sense basically means "the government is the insurer"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna @sigfig
basically what I mean you can have state paying for healthcare but you can ALSO have private insurers why make it an either/or
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @whitequark @sigfig
wait do you mean the state pays the private insurers to provide healthcare?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna @sigfig
e.g.: the state acts as an insurer and provides healthcare in state-run clinics, and *also* private insurers provide HC in private clinics
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
That's a really bad idea, formula for multiple tiers of care quality.
-
-
Replying to @RichFelker
with all respect, you are wrong and reductionist explanations like this are harmful.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.