It's not like they need to check EVERYTHING, just the results of the tracking, to make sure the one result doesn't say SCALD YOUR GENITALS.
Nobody is arguing for them to "police what's true". We're arguing for them to stop elevating/promoting utter bullshit to appear as truth.
-
-
If they can't avoid doing that, then eliminate the "feature" altogether and just show nothing but search results.
-
that is the part that i think that you dont undesrtand , what do you think that are "they"? a person?, a single machine?, an algorithm?
-
"They" here is Google. Choice of what to present as search results (i.e. choice to add the featured snippets) is a design choice.
-
as a company of 57k employes? thats the problem, you are living in the last century, where one person is behind a computer. Here is not.
-
The snippets are generated automagically , a single person cant be responsible , an a machine can be tricket to have "quakery" results
-
Apparently you missed the part where I said if they can't avoid that then the feature should not exist at all.
-
But they CAN easily avoid that. Failure to do so is a policy choice, not technical inability or cost-prohibitive.
-
substitute "they" for google , and think about it, a company objetive is make money. Not be true.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.