very hard, each week there are a new pseudo science that must be debunked
I've had this conversation plenty times before and the people making your argument are wrong. Not repeating it. Bye.
-
-
ok, bye, have a nice life. A short one if you think that a private company must police what is true.
-
Nobody is arguing for them to "police what's true". We're arguing for them to stop elevating/promoting utter bullshit to appear as truth.
-
If they can't avoid doing that, then eliminate the "feature" altogether and just show nothing but search results.
-
that is the part that i think that you dont undesrtand , what do you think that are "they"? a person?, a single machine?, an algorithm?
-
"They" here is Google. Choice of what to present as search results (i.e. choice to add the featured snippets) is a design choice.
-
as a company of 57k employes? thats the problem, you are living in the last century, where one person is behind a computer. Here is not.
-
The snippets are generated automagically , a single person cant be responsible , an a machine can be tricket to have "quakery" results
-
Apparently you missed the part where I said if they can't avoid that then the feature should not exist at all.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.