Oh look, yet another example of Google's featured snippets elevating debunked pseudoscience to appear authoritativepic.twitter.com/dWhaC7I8Zu
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
2 issues. 1. Noteworthy should be necessary condition for phrase getting a snippet at all. 2. Source of snippet should be reliable for truth
do you want to google police what is true and what is not? think about what power that entails.
I've had this conversation plenty times before and the people making your argument are wrong. Not repeating it. Bye.
ok, bye, have a nice life. A short one if you think that a private company must police what is true.
Nobody is arguing for them to "police what's true". We're arguing for them to stop elevating/promoting utter bullshit to appear as truth.
If they can't avoid doing that, then eliminate the "feature" altogether and just show nothing but search results.
that is the part that i think that you dont undesrtand , what do you think that are "they"? a person?, a single machine?, an algorithm?
"They" here is Google. Choice of what to present as search results (i.e. choice to add the featured snippets) is a design choice.
as a company of 57k employes? thats the problem, you are living in the last century, where one person is behind a computer. Here is not.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.