If Person A says Person B hurt them, and Person B is more powerful and has the ability to keep hurting them: Default to believing Person A
-
-
Replying to @sehurlburt
Belief is one thing, the danger is in defaulting to punishing Person B due to the same reason.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jtregunna
What makes me most sad isn't Person B not being punished, but Person A not being made safe.
1 reply 1 retweet 37 likes -
Replying to @sehurlburt @jtregunna
Stephanie Hurlburt Retweeted Stephanie Hurlburt
The workers could have their conditions improved, the woman could safely move to another team.https://twitter.com/sehurlburt/status/868518867005341696 …
Stephanie Hurlburt added,
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @sehurlburt
Agreed. My comment is merely about the knee jerk reaction of many to no platform Person B in the wake of Person A’s allegations
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jtregunna @sehurlburt
I've never seen a call to no-platform with any momentum where it wasn't beyond-obvious the right thing to do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Even if the allegation is not obviously accurate, their reactions to it & toxicity of other stuff they've done/said/written makes it clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
You’re in a weird world then, I’ve seen several cases (mostly within universities granted). Even when the person is toxic 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jtregunna @RichFelker
respect the community which you’re in. Violent protests hurt the local communities. Peaceful assembly > no platform protests 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Totally missing how you think this is violent or disrespectful to communities.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.