Linux community isn't in a reasonable position to criticise Microsoft on security. Mainstream distributions are much worse off than Windows.
-
-
Replying to @CopperheadOS
Linux community != mainstream distros. And desktops != servers.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker @CopperheadOS
A good Linux distro, or even a mediocre distro with competent admin to remove crap packages, is not vulnerable to remote attacks.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
Can't agree with that at all. Even if you ignore all of userspace, the Linux kernel has plenty of RCE bugs and very weak defences there.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CopperheadOS
Plenty of RCE bugs? Over what time period? I've seen "plenty" of local, very few remote. Attack surface for remote is very low.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
Attack surface is low? There's a huge network stack with an enormous amount of features written in a memory unsafe language in the kernel.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Most of the feature surface is only exposed when configuration/local applications use it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.