The Q is not should NYT have editorial standards. Of course they should. And maybe they're wrong here (it's actually irrelevant if they are)
There's no such thing as lack of bias; the best we can hope for and demand is transparent bias in the right directions.
-
-
Or better, to not centralize the bias into giant monopolies of super-editors. Have diverse sets of publishers and keep the platforms neutral
-
There's no such thing as neutral. The very existence of the platform alters power dynamics.
-
Letting whoever naturally benefits from that alteration benefit is inherently a bias towards that party.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.