(2) Be intentionally broad. Don't call a climate article fake for one misinterpreted fact. Call if fake if overall message is denialism.
Biases can be transparent; transparent here means they're documented in a public place, where people can judge and respond to them.
-
-
Would you feel the same way if those biases leaned strongly away from your views on important topics?
-
That's a complex topic, but in other areas on SM those biases already lean strongly opposite way.
-
Things like trans users getting banned for "real names policy", BF pics banned, vicious harassment dismissed as "not a ToS violation".
-
There's no such thing as lack of bias; the best we can hope for and demand is transparent bias in the right directions.
-
Or better, to not centralize the bias into giant monopolies of super-editors. Have diverse sets of publishers and keep the platforms neutral
-
There's no such thing as neutral. The very existence of the platform alters power dynamics.
-
Letting whoever naturally benefits from that alteration benefit is inherently a bias towards that party.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.