Is the answer "no" because it's NYT? But now you're elevating NYT into a special case because of it's brand, not the piece's "truthiness".
No, what you've done is fixed a flaw in social media that boosts the flow of misinformation.
-
-
Prior to social media, a few placed misinformation pieces even in NYT would have fairly small impact...
-
...because there was no organized way to pass them around to exactly the audiences who would believe and be influenced by them.
-
Having SM treat misinformation pieces as "fake news" and deboost/hide/cleverly manage feeds of ppl who share them does not unpublish them.
-
What it aims to do is nullify the social media advantage that would otherwise be enjoyed by such misinformation.
-
What it looks like to me is a plan to give socmed companies enormous say over what articles their users should read without an attempt ...
-
to think through whether it creates a structure that can itself distort info read by users, and in more pernicious ways than the status quo
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.