Is the answer "no" because it's NYT? But now you're elevating NYT into a special case because of it's brand, not the piece's "truthiness".
The problem is that the entire "opinion" is counter-factual, not a topic of opinion. Minor slip-up/CYA-failure is not the problem.
-
-
I think that stance sounds logical until you look at the democratic process which elected a denier. Convincing the masses requires leveling
-
No, it requires cutting off the channels of disinformation. Letting their disinformation have mainstream platforms is what got him elected.
-
Month after month of "news" filled with nothing but manufactured scandals. Cut that crap off.
-
I get that the vibe is wrong, I've read it 3 times, but the message seems like an olive branch. saying burn it down digs trenches
-
yet i'd say 95% of folks I agree with are taking Bret's history and his words & saying he's a wolf in sheep's clothing and he's normalizing
-
but what the folks I agree with miss, is that we're the oddballs, the idea of growing future protecting our planet is abnormal
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.