The NYT controversy is exactly why USTech becoming Curators of Truth to combat fake news isn't as trivial or unproblematic as we might like
-
-
Climate change denial, holocaust denial, anti-vax, etc. all come to mind as very simple and clear-cut.
-
Clearly it's not so simple and clear cut because NYT's editorial staff allowed this one through. That's the whole point.
-
They HIRED a known climate-denial clown. That's not "let through" - it's intentional.
-
It's not about truth. It's about bothsidesism in the face of a political climate where an utterly false narrative has big following.
-
The operative Q isn't whether Bret or NYT are right, but whether 3rd parties should intervene to penalize the article to combat "fake news"
-
And the answer is yes they should. This is not the hard question you are making it out to be.
-
What you've just done is taken an editorial decision from NYT and handed it to editors at a tech co, who're vetoing NYT's editorial decision
-
No, what you've done is fixed a flaw in social media that boosts the flow of misinformation.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.