https://twitter.com/jonoberheide/status/857243764800225280 … It will still be GPLv2 since customers are paying for sources licensed as GPLv2. Legally, they could publish it.
OK, just a guess - surprising that I'd seen that same (seemingly wrong) example from multiple ppl arguing about grsec.
-
-
Red Hat will terminate your support agreement if you publish stuff, IIRC.
-
Still have access to the public sources, but they intentionally obfuscate stuff by applying all the patches and giving tarballs of result.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.