I think the @CopperheadOS developer is right here, but this move definitely violates the _spirit_ of the GPL.https://twitter.com/CopperheadOS/status/857327490385281028 …
In rare cases it really is sufficiently independent that it might not be a derivative work by itself, BUT...
-
-
...if the non-derivative-work part of the patch is not licensed GPL-compatible, binaries generated with it cannot be distributed at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.