The spirit of the GPL is about user freedom, not publishing code or contributing back. They aren't what the FSF cares about or tried to do.
-
-
So what happens if I created a Linux kernel patch released under a BSD license (not including a single byte of the GPL'ed kernel source)?
-
All the cases I found talk about patching GPL'ed code and distributing the result.. or the patch together with the result.
-
Also what is "non-trivial".
-
Do this many people really not understand that legal matters like this require interpretation by a court??
-
I'm not interpreting. I'm asking because I think these cases are not as clear as might appear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.