1. For now, the logging/surveillance infrastructure on VPS providers is likely tailored for servers not VPN'd clients.
-
-
-
2. By using commercial VPN inet service, you identify as "intentionally hiding". Using VPN-to-VPS looks like "work from home".
-
3. You said DO/AWS, but you can choose a VPS instead in a jurisdiction with stronger privacy laws...
-
4. Most of this is about mitigating privacy invasion & dragnet surveillance, not targeted attacks; no VPN addresses latter.
-
5. VPS providers are a competitive market; privacy invasion of customers would hurt them badly if it came out.
-
(The main reason we need regulation to stop privacy invasion by ISPs is that they're local monopolies, not competitive.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.