1/ Eric Schmidt says YouTube’s algos need rewriting to make extremist content “harder to find” to solve brand safetyhttp://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/297739/att-verizon-pull-ads-alphabets-schmidt-concede.html …
In a way that's good if it were about censoring things which are just "unpopular", "obscene", etc.
-
-
But they're happy to reject "obscene" content (even +ing a 'restr. mode' declaring all LGBT creators obscene).
-
I'm willing to accept that it was an unintended mistake, an unfortunate side-effect of arcane classification.
-
If it were a mistake they would have fixed it by now, or at least publicly declared it a mistake.
-
They KNOW the target audience of this feature (K-12 edu, etc.) wants to make LGBT people disappear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The reasoning is they don't want to draw the line themselves, because slippery slope to partisanship.
-
The idea that rejecting hate speech/movements is partisan is itself a partisan idea.
-
The very fact that we're having conversations over this is a huge win neo-nazis have set up for themselves.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.