Did you hear the alternative facts from @hdevalence last week? Let's now take a look at the _actual_ facts: https://eindhoven.cr.yp.to/false-statements-by-henry-de-valence.txt …
-
-
Replying to @hashbreaker @hdevalence
"Alt facts" = things that are objectively, verifiably false. Not a victim's acct of their experience you distrust.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
Did you read?
@hdevalence has stated many things (and implied/insinuated many more) that are objectively, verifiably false.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @hashbreaker @hdevalence
I think you're working with "alternative" definitions of "objective" and "verifiable".
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
You're making a fool of yourself. Some of the claims from
@hdevalence don't even survive a check against the email he dumped.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @hashbreaker @hdevalence
I'll let others be the judge of which one of us is making a fool of ourselves.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
From my perspective you're making a choice to be on the wrong side of history.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker @hashbreaker
I don't really care about any details of
@hdevalence's account. You made a mistake enabling & defending Jacob. Just apologize.2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes
Digging in makes you not just somebody who made a mistake, but somebody who chose to be the bad guy after he knew.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.