Did you hear the alternative facts from @hdevalence last week? Let's now take a look at the _actual_ facts: https://eindhoven.cr.yp.to/false-statements-by-henry-de-valence.txt …
-
-
Did you read?
@hdevalence has stated many things (and implied/insinuated many more) that are objectively, verifiably false. -
I think you're working with "alternative" definitions of "objective" and "verifiable".
-
You're making a fool of yourself. Some of the claims from
@hdevalence don't even survive a check against the email he dumped. -
I'll let others be the judge of which one of us is making a fool of ourselves.
-
From my perspective you're making a choice to be on the wrong side of history.
-
I don't really care about any details of
@hdevalence's account. You made a mistake enabling & defending Jacob. Just apologize. -
You think that, in defending _myself_ against a smear campaign, I'm "enabling" or "defending" Mr. Appelbaum? Please clarify.
-
No, wrt enabling/defending I was talking about the past, before everything came out in the open.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Misusing that terminology to label someone's experiences like you did puts you in really deplorable company.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.